Why we prefer FUE method

FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) and FUT (Follicular Unit Transplantation) are two commonly used techniques in hair transplant surgery. While both methods have their advantages, here are the advantages of FUE over FUT:

1. No linear scar: FUE does not involve the removal of a strip of scalp tissue from the donor area, as in FUT. Instead, individual hair follicles are extracted one by one using a specialized punch tool. This results in tiny, dot-like scars that are spread across the donor area. The absence of a linear scar makes FUE a more attractive option for individuals who prefer to keep their hair short.

2. Minimal invasiveness: FUE is a minimally invasive procedure compared to FUT. The absence of a large linear incision in FUE means there is less tissue trauma, reduced bleeding, and a faster healing process. Patients typically experience less postoperative discomfort and a quicker recovery time.

3. Versatility in donor area selection: FUE allows the surgeon to extract hair follicles from a broader donor area, including the back of the scalp, sides, beard, chest, or other body parts. This provides more flexibility in selecting donor hairs, especially in individuals with limited donor supply or those who have undergone previous FUT procedures.

4. Lower risk of complications: FUE carries a lower risk of complications compared to FUT. The absence of a large incision decreases the likelihood of nerve damage, reduced blood supply to the scalp, and wound healing issues. Additionally, FUE reduces the risk of postoperative infections and complications associated with sutures used in FUT.

5. No linear limitations: FUE allows the surgeon to harvest hair follicles from multiple areas, avoiding the limitations of a single strip of scalp tissue (as in FUT). This is particularly beneficial for individuals with extensive hair loss or those requiring multiple hair transplant procedures over time.

6. No need for sutures: FUE does not require the use of sutures or stitches to close a linear incision, as in FUT. The absence of sutures eliminates the need for suture removal, reducing post-operative discomfort and the risk of suture-related complications.

7. Less downtime and scarring: Due to its less invasive nature, FUE generally involves a faster recovery time compared to FUT. The smaller, dot-like scars from FUE are also less noticeable and allow patients to have more freedom in styling their hair, including wearing it short or shaved.

While FUE offers several advantages, it's important to note that the technique is more time-consuming and labor-intensive for the surgeon, and it may be associated with a higher cost compared to FUT. The choice between FUE and FUT should be made in consultation with a qualified hair transplant surgeon, taking into consideration factors such as the individual's hair loss pattern, donor supply, and specific goals and preferences.